Can You Sue a Brand for False Advertising in India? A Complete Legal Guide
Consumer Court

Can You Sue a Brand for False Advertising in India? A Complete Legal Guide

Introduction

The influence of advertisements on consumer choices is undeniable. Every day, we are bombarded with advertisements that shape our buying decisions. However, not all advertisements are honest. Many brands make exaggerated claims, conceal important information, or misrepresent facts to lure consumers into buying their products. False advertising can mislead consumers and, in some cases, even cause financial loss or health hazards.

A classic example is the advertising of fairness creams that promise instant skin lightening. Similarly, many health and nutritional supplements claim unrealistic benefits without any scientific backing. In India, the law provides avenues for consumers to take legal action against such misleading advertisements. This guide explains how consumers can hold brands accountable for false advertising, what legal provisions apply, and how to seek justice.

Understanding False Advertising in India

False advertising refers to promotional activities that contain misleading, deceptive, or untrue statements about a product or service. It can take various forms, including:

  • Exaggerated Claims: Promising unrealistic benefits, such as “Get fair in just seven days” or “Lose 10 kg in a month without dieting.”

  • Omissions and Concealment: Hiding crucial information, such as side effects of a medicine.

  • Comparative Misrepresentation: Claiming superiority over competitors without valid proof.

  • Fake Endorsements: Using celebrities or influencers who do not actually use the product.

  • Deceptive Pricing: Displaying fake discounts or hidden charges.

Legal Provisions to Combat False Advertising

There was a time when no comprehensive law existed to regulate misleading advertisements in India. Courts and regulatory authorities addressed complaints on a case-by-case basis. However, today, multiple laws provide remedies against false advertising, including:

  1. Consumer Protection Act, 2019

  2. Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954

  3. Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006

  4. Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995

  5. Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) Regulations

  6. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) Guidelines

  7. Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) Regulations

Let’s explore each of these in detail.

Consumer Protection Act, 2019: A Powerful Tool for Consumers

Under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, a consumer can take action against a brand for false advertising. The Act considers false advertising an unfair trade practice and provides the following remedies:

  • Refund of money equivalent to the product’s price.

  • Compensation for any loss or injury suffered.

  • Corrective advertising orders, where the advertiser is directed to issue a public correction.

  • Punitive damages and litigation costs if the false advertisement caused harm.

A consumer can file a complaint before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at the district, state, or national level, depending on the case’s monetary value.

How to File a Complaint?

To file a case under the Consumer Protection Act, follow these steps:

  1. Gather Evidence: Save copies of advertisements, receipts, and proof of misleading claims.

  2. Draft a Complaint: Include the brand’s name, misleading statements, and the harm caused.

  3. Approach the Consumer Forum: File the complaint with the relevant Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

  4. Legal Representation: If needed, consult a consumer rights lawyer.

Other Legal Remedies for False Advertising

1. Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954

This Act prohibits misleading advertisements related to drugs, medicines, and magic remedies. If a brand falsely claims that a product can cure an illness, consumers can file complaints under this law.

2. Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) regulates food advertisements. If a food product claims to have health benefits without scientific backing, action can be taken under this Act.

3. Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995

This Act regulates misleading advertisements on TV channels. The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting monitors ads that violate advertising guidelines.

4. Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) Regulations

If an insurance company misrepresents policy benefits, consumers can file complaints with IRDA.

5. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) Guidelines

Misleading offers by telecom companies fall under TRAI regulations. Customers can complain to TRAI for deceptive mobile recharge plans or broadband advertisements.

Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI): A Self-Regulatory Body

The Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) monitors advertisements to ensure ethical standards. Consumers can file complaints against misleading advertisements through ASCI. Although ASCI does not impose legal penalties, it can direct advertisers to withdraw misleading ads.

How to File a Complaint with ASCI?

You can submit a complaint in the following ways:

  • Online: Visit www.ascionline.org and fill out the complaint form.

  • Email: Send an email to asci@vsnl.com.

  • Call: Dial 022-23513982 (Mumbai office) or 1-800-22-2724 (toll-free number).

  • Post: Write to The Secretary-General, ASCI, 219 Bombay Market, Tardeo, Mumbai 400034.

Who Can File a Complaint?

  • Any consumer affected by misleading advertisements.

  • Government authorities and consumer organizations.

  • Competitor brands.

  • Suo moto complaints from ASCI members.

Landmark Cases on False Advertising in India

1. HUL vs. Emami (Fairness Creams Dispute)

Two major brands, Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL) and Emami, had a legal dispute over fairness cream advertisements. HUL accused Emami of misleading claims, and the case highlighted the need for stricter advertising regulations.

2. Patanjali vs. FSSAI (Misleading Health Claims)

Patanjali Ayurved was accused of making misleading claims about its food and medicine products. The FSSAI intervened and took action against the brand.

3. Nestlé Maggi Ban (Misrepresentation of Ingredients)

Nestlé India’s Maggi noodles were banned in 2015 due to misleading claims about lead content. This case set a precedent for stricter food advertising regulations.

Conclusion: Protecting Consumer Rights Against False Advertising

False advertising is a growing concern in India, affecting consumers' financial and health well-being. However, legal provisions empower consumers to take action against deceptive brands. If you have been misled by false advertisements, you can seek justice through:

  • Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (monetary compensation and corrective ads)

  • ASCI complaint (removal of misleading ads)

  • Industry-specific regulators (FSSAI, IRDA, TRAI, etc.)

  • Legal action in consumer courts

Always stay vigilant while purchasing products and be aware of your legal rights as a consumer. Misleading advertisements should not go unchecked—empower yourself and take action!

Need Legal Help? Consult a top civil lawyer in India to guide you through false advertising claims and consumer protection laws.

CCPA Tightens the Noose on Misleading Advertisements in the Coaching Sector
Consumer Protection

CCPA Tightens the Noose on Misleading Advertisements in the Coaching Sector

On November 13, 2024, the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) took a bold step toward safeguarding consumer rights by introducing the Guidelines for Prevention of Misleading Advertisement in Coaching Sector, 2024 (“Guidelines”). These Guidelines aim to address long-standing issues of false claims, deliberate concealment of crucial information, and misleading guarantees within the coaching industry. This move aligns with the CCPA’s broader mandate of promoting and protecting consumer interests, specifically targeting the education sector, which has witnessed a surge in coaching-related advertisements over the years.

Understanding Coaching and Its Scope

The Guidelines define coaching as any form of academic support, education, guidance, or instruction offered through study programs, tuition, or similar activities. Importantly, it excludes activities like counseling, sports, dance, theater, and other creative pursuits. Furthermore, the Guidelines apply only to coaching centers that serve more than 50 students, as defined under the Coaching Centre Guidelines issued by the Ministry of Education earlier this year.

This nuanced definition ensures a clear scope of applicability while focusing on larger establishments that significantly influence students’ academic journeys.

Applicability of the Guidelines

The Guidelines are comprehensive in their coverage, addressing all forms of advertisements related to coaching services. As per the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (CPA, 2019), advertisements include:

  1. Any audio or visual publicity, endorsements, or representations through mediums like print, electronic media, websites, or even product labels and invoices.

  2. Advertisements by individuals, firms, companies, or endorsers whose opinions, beliefs, or experiences are reflected in the promotional material.

These broad criteria underline the inclusive nature of the Guidelines, ensuring no loopholes exist for misleading practices.

Key Mandates of the Guidelines

The Guidelines outline specific do’s and don’ts to foster transparency and truthfulness in coaching-related advertisements.

Do’s: Ensuring Transparency and Honesty

  1. Transparency in Information: Advertisements must disclose critical details such as the rank, name, and course duration alongside the candidate’s photograph. If a student has paid for a course, it should be explicitly stated.

  2. Prominent Disclaimers: Disclaimers about results or guarantees should be displayed prominently and not obscured by design or font variations.

  3. Truthful Representations: Coaching centers must accurately represent their services, facilities, faculty credentials, and the recognition or approval of regulatory bodies like the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) or the University Grants Commission (UGC), where applicable.

  4. Accurate Reporting: Information regarding resources, infrastructure, and success rates must reflect reality.

  5. Collaboration with the National Consumer Helpline: Coaching centers are encouraged to partner with the National Consumer Helpline to enhance transparency and accountability.

Don’ts: Curbing Misleading Practices

  1. Unconsented Use of Candidate Information: Testimonials, names, photographs, or videos of successful candidates cannot be used without their written consent, which must be obtained after the student’s selection.

  2. Deceptive Disclaimers: Disclaimers should not be misleading by design, such as using different fonts or placing critical information in less noticeable sections of the advertisement.

  3. False Guarantees: Any promise of guaranteed selection, high ranks, or job placements is strictly prohibited.

Identifying Misleading Advertisements

The Guidelines categorize misleading advertisements into three primary types:

1. False Claims

These involve inaccuracies about:

  1. Courses offered

  2. Duration and credentials of faculty

  3. Fees, refund policies, or exit strategies

  4. Selection rates, exam ranks, or success guarantees

  5. Job promotions or salary increases

2. False Representations

Misrepresenting the standard or quality of services provided constitutes a violation. For example, overstating infrastructure capabilities or faculty expertise is prohibited.

3. False Sense of Urgency

Advertisements that pressure consumers into making immediate decisions under the guise of urgency or scarcity (e.g., "Last chance to enroll!") fall under this category.

Consequences for Non-Compliance

Non-compliance with the Guidelines can attract severe penalties under the CPA, 2019. The possible repercussions include:

  1. Discontinuation of unfair trade practices.

  2. Withdrawal of misleading products or services from the market.

  3. Imposition of hefty fines or imprisonment, depending on the severity of the violation.

By introducing these stringent measures, the CCPA aims to create a transparent and consumer-friendly environment within the coaching sector.

Comparative Context: Past Initiatives

The 2024 Guidelines are not the first regulatory attempt by the CCPA to curb misleading advertisements. In 2022, the Misleading Advertisement Guidelines, 2022, were issued to set overarching conditions for advertising across various sectors. These included provisions against bait advertising, surrogate advertisements, and deceptive claims targeting children.

Additionally, the Ministry of Education’s Coaching Centre Guidelines (January 2024) and the Advertising Standards Council of India’s (ASCI) Guidelines for Advertising of Educational Institutions have made strides in regulating the sector. However, the new Guidelines offer a more focused approach tailored to the unique challenges of the coaching industry.

Impact on Coaching Centers

The introduction of these Guidelines marks a significant shift in the operational practices of coaching centers. Here’s what coaching centers need to do:

  1. Review Advertising Content: All promotional material must align with the Guidelines to avoid false claims or misrepresentation.

  2. Ensure Accurate Reporting: Information about faculty qualifications, infrastructure, and success rates must be fact-checked and verified.

  3. Update Legal Agreements: Consent forms and agreements with students must be revised to comply with the new mandates.

  4. Reevaluate Marketing Strategies: Coaching centers must adopt ethical marketing practices that focus on genuine results and student satisfaction.

Broader Implications for the Coaching Industry

The Guidelines signify a paradigm shift, emphasizing trust, transparency, and consumer rights in the coaching sector. While the immediate implementation may require effort and adjustments, the long-term benefits include:

  1. Enhanced credibility for coaching centers.

  2. Better protection for students and parents against exploitative practices.

  3. Creation of a student-centric ecosystem.

These changes are particularly significant in a country like India, where coaching plays a pivotal role in shaping academic and professional futures.

Conclusion

The CCPA’s Guidelines for Prevention of Misleading Advertisement in Coaching Sector, 2024, represent a milestone in consumer protection. By addressing the unique challenges of the coaching industry, the Guidelines aim to foster a fair and transparent environment for students and parents alike.

As coaching centers adapt to these changes, the focus must remain on creating ethical practices that prioritize student welfare over aggressive marketing. While the road to full compliance may be challenging, the end goal of a trustworthy and student-centric ecosystem will benefit the education sector as a whole.

The CCPA’s proactive measures remind us that consumer rights are paramount, and the days of misleading advertisements in the coaching industry are numbered.