Blog

Also Read: How to Become a Lawyer in India: A Comprehensive Guide

Background: Why Did the BCI Take This Step?

The Rapid Growth of Law Colleges

Over the last two decades, India has witnessed an explosion in the number of law colleges, especially private institutions. While this growth has expanded access to legal education, it has also compromised quality in many cases.

Many colleges function with:

1. Inadequate infrastructure (libraries, moot courts, e-libraries).

2. Shortage of qualified faculty, with some colleges relying on part-time or underqualified teachers.

3. Poor regulation as state universities grant affiliations without proper inspections.

Earlier Attempts at Regulation

This is not the first time BCI has introduced such a moratorium.

1. In 2019, the BCI imposed a similar three-year freeze on new law colleges. However, it was struck down by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in 2020, which ruled that such restrictions must be enacted through formal rules rather than administrative orders.

2. The 2025 moratorium, therefore, has been introduced via formal amendments to the Rules of Legal Education, making it legally stronger and more difficult to challenge.

Official Reasons Stated by BCI

The BCI has clearly outlined why this moratorium is necessary:

1. Preventing commercialization of legal education.

2. Stopping widespread academic malpractice.

3. Addressing shortage of qualified faculty.

4. Ensuring stricter inspections and compliance audits for existing institutions.

Also Read: Supreme Court to Decide: Will Law Degrees in India Become Shorter and More Affordable?

Key Provisions of the Moratorium

The BCI’s announcement includes several specific restrictions:

1. No new law colleges for three years – Universities, private bodies, and trusts cannot establish new centres of legal education until at least 2028.

2. No expansion of existing colleges without approval – Existing law colleges cannot start new courses, new batches, or expand intake without express written permission from BCI.

3. Increased inspections – Existing colleges will face stricter inspections and audits. Institutions failing to meet prescribed standards risk closure or derecognition.

4. Freeze on NOCs and affiliations – The BCI will discourage state governments and universities from granting new No Objection Certificates (NOCs) or affiliations during the moratorium.

Also Read: Top Reasons to Hire an Experienced Civil Lawyer in Delhi

Why India Doesn’t Need More Law Colleges (For Now)

Existing Capacity Is Already High

With 2000+ law colleges already operating, India produces around 60,000–70,000 law graduates annually. This is significantly higher than the absorption capacity of the current legal profession and judiciary.

Quality Over Quantity

1. Many students graduate with degrees but lack practical skills like drafting, litigation, and client handling.

2. Bar Council’s All India Bar Examination (AIBE) often reveals low pass percentages, reflecting poor academic standards.

The Faculty Shortage Crisis

1. Law teaching requires highly qualified professors, many with LLM and PhD degrees.

2. However, most law graduates prefer litigation or corporate jobs, leaving academia underpopulated.

3. As a result, vacant teaching posts are common across universities and colleges.

Also Read: Know About The Annual Compliance Filings For LLPs

Implications of the Moratorium

The moratorium has wide-reaching implications across different stakeholders:

1. For Students

1. Reduced new admissions: Students in smaller towns may face reduced access to new law colleges.

2. Improved quality: On the positive side, the existing institutions will hopefully improve their standards, benefiting students in the long run.

3. More competition: With limited colleges, competition for admission into top law schools and universities will rise.

2. For Universities and Private Trusts

1. Universities and trusts that had plans to establish new law colleges will now have to wait at least three years.

2. Institutions will need to focus on compliance with infrastructure, faculty, and quality audits.

3. For the Legal Profession

1. Better trained graduates: The moratorium could result in more professionally competent law graduates.

2. Reduced dilution of the profession: By curbing mushrooming of low-quality colleges, the prestige of the profession may be preserved.

4. For the Judiciary

1. Courts often deal with petitions challenging law college approvals or recognition. A moratorium could reduce such litigation.

2. The judiciary may also play a role in scrutinizing BCI’s move, as happened in 2020.

Addressing Criticisms: Is the Freeze Fair?

Like any sweeping reform, the BCI’s move has both supporters and critics.

Supporters Argue:

1. It will improve the credibility of law degrees.

2. It will prevent exploitative private colleges from charging high fees without offering quality.

3. It allows India to consolidate resources and focus on strengthening existing institutions.

Critics Argue:

1. It could limit opportunities for students in regions where there are very few law colleges.

2. It may encourage monopolistic behavior by existing colleges (e.g., charging higher fees).

3. Some question whether a moratorium is the right solution instead of better regulatory enforcement.

The Larger Issue: Commercialization of Legal Education

One of the BCI’s strongest justifications is to curb commercialization.

How Commercialization Happens

1. Many private trusts set up law colleges primarily as profit-making ventures, not academic institutions.

2. Students often pay exorbitant fees for inadequate teaching, poor libraries, and lack of moot court exposure.

3. Some colleges exist only on paper, with “ghost faculty” and fake attendance records.

Impact on Legal Profession

1. Poorly trained graduates flood the job market.

2. Genuine students and institutions lose credibility.

3. The legal profession’s overall standard suffers.

Historical Context: Evolution of Legal Education in India

• Before 1985: Legal education was mostly delivered through 3-year LL.B. programs in government universities.

• 1985 onwards: The establishment of National Law School of India University (NLSIU), Bangalore, introduced the 5-year integrated law course.

• 2000s: Private law schools mushroomed rapidly across India.

• 2010s–2020s: Regulatory challenges mounted as low-quality institutions diluted standards.

The moratorium marks an attempt to return to the founding vision of law education: rigorous training, high academic standards, and producing competent legal professionals.

What Happens During the Moratorium?

The three years are not meant to be idle time. Instead, the BCI plans to:

1. Conduct nationwide inspections of existing law colleges.

2. Enforce minimum standards of infrastructure, faculty, and curriculum.

3. Introduce reforms in syllabi to align with global standards.

4. Strengthen the All India Bar Exam (AIBE) as a gatekeeping measure.

5. Work with universities to encourage research, moot courts, internships, and clinical legal education.

Possible Long-Term Outcomes

If implemented effectively, the moratorium could result in:

1. Higher employability of law graduates.

2. Better global rankings for Indian law schools.

3. Enhanced access to justice, as well-trained lawyers will strengthen the judiciary and legal aid systems.

4. A move towards specialized law programs (cyber law, environmental law, arbitration, etc.).

Challenges Ahead

The moratorium is not a magic wand. Its success depends on:

• Effective monitoring: BCI must avoid bureaucratic delays and corruption.

• Faculty development: Incentives must be created for graduates to join teaching.

• Balancing access and quality: Rural and small-town students should not be left behind.

• Handling legal challenges: Universities or trusts may approach courts against the moratorium.

Comparative Perspective: What Other Countries Do

• United States: The American Bar Association (ABA) strictly regulates law schools; very few are approved each year.

• United Kingdom: Law is primarily studied at universities, with strict entry requirements and professional training thereafter.

• Singapore & Hong Kong: Limited law schools with extremely rigorous standards.

India’s moratorium mirrors such global practices, aiming to prioritize quality over proliferation.

What Students Should Do in This Period

For aspiring law students:

1. Focus on established institutions with proven track records.

2. Prepare well for CLAT and state-level law entrance exams.

3. Explore alternative legal career pathways such as paralegal studies, legal tech, and corporate compliance.

4. Use the moratorium period to demand better internships, research opportunities, and clinical legal education from institutions.

Conclusion

The Bar Council of India’s decision to freeze approvals for new law colleges for three years marks a historic shift in legal education policy. While it may temporarily restrict expansion, the move is aimed at consolidating, auditing, and strengthening India’s legal education ecosystem.

If executed with transparency and commitment, the moratorium could prove to be a turning point that raises the prestige of Indian law degrees, ensures better-trained graduates, and ultimately strengthens the justice delivery system.

The challenge now lies in implementation—ensuring that the freeze does not merely halt expansion but actively leads to meaningful reforms. The coming three years will be crucial in determining whether India’s legal education can reclaim its standards and prepare the next generation of lawyers for the challenges of a complex, globalized world.

Also Read: How to Become a Lawyer in India: A Comprehensive Guide

What Triggered This PIL?

The PIL was filed in the Supreme Court by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, a practicing lawyer and public interest advocate known for filing socially relevant cases. In his petition titled “Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India & Ors”, he raised several pressing concerns:

1. The five-year integrated LL.B programme is excessively long and financially burdensome.

2. The two-year LL.M programme adds further delay and cost for students.

3. The current system does not align with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, which recommends a four-year multidisciplinary undergraduate programme.

4. Legal education lacks a dedicated regulatory commission, unlike medicine or engineering.

5. Many private colleges and even National Law Universities (NLUs) charge exorbitant fees, making legal education inaccessible for students from economically weaker backgrounds.

Also Read: Supreme Court Mandates Three Years of Legal Practice for Judicial Service Eligibility: A Complete Guide

Supreme Court’s Response: Who Has Been Notified?

On July 2025, a bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi issued notices to:

1. Central Government

2. Bar Council of India (BCI)

3. University Grants Commission (UGC)

4. Law Commission of India

All these bodies have been asked to file their responses before the next hearing on September 9, 2025. The matter now lies before the highest constitutional court in the country.

Also Read: Top Ten Criminal Lawyers In India

Key Demands in the PIL

Here’s a simplified breakdown of what the PIL demands:

Formation of a Legal Education Commission

1. A regulatory body consisting of jurists, retired judges, senior advocates, and legal scholars.

2. Purpose: To study and recommend reforms to the structure, duration, pedagogy, and accessibility of law degrees.

Shortening of the Law Degree Duration

1. Revise the five-year LL.B and two-year LL.M courses to align with NEP 2020 standards.

2. Possibility of a four-year integrated LL.B, or three-year undergraduate + one-year LL.B. model.

Affordability and Access

1. Make legal education more affordable by regulating fee structures, especially in private institutions.

2. Provide scholarships and education loans with lower interest rates for law students.

Early Entry into Legal Practice

1. Encourage early entry into the profession by reducing academic delays.

2. Cites examples of legends like:

   1. Ram Jethmalani, who began practice at 17

   2. Fali Nariman, who earned his law degree by age 21

Dedicated Regulatory Authority

• Proposes a Law Education Commission similar to:

  1. National Medical Commission (NMC) for medical education

  2. All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) for engineering and technology

Legal Education in India: Current System

Five-Year Integrated LL.B

1. Introduced in 1987 through the National Law School of India University Act.

2. Combines a Bachelor’s degree (B.A., B.Com, B.Sc) with LL.B.

3. Popular among students post-12th grade.

Three-Year LL.B

1. For students who already hold an undergraduate degree.

2. Still offered by many public and private universities.

Two-Year LL.M

1. Postgraduate legal education.

2. Focuses on research and specialization (e.g., corporate law, criminal law, constitutional law).

Fee Structures

1. NLUs charge between ₹2 lakh to ₹3.5 lakh per year.

2. Private colleges may charge even more.

3. Law education can easily cost over ₹10–15 lakhs, making it unaffordable for many.

Why Advocate Ashwini Upadhyay Thinks It’s a Problem

1. High Costs = Limited Access

1. Students from low-income families often cannot afford law school.

2. Many give up the dream due to tuition fees, hostel expenses, and exam costs.

2. Lengthy Education = Delayed Career Start

• A five-year law degree followed by two years of LL.M can delay earning opportunities until age 25 or later.

3. Mismatch with NEP 2020

1. NEP encourages flexibility, multidisciplinary learning, and early employability.

2. Law education, the PIL argues, hasn’t kept up with these reforms.

4. Regulatory Gaps

1. No single authority governs legal education.

2. BCI focuses on professional licensing, while UGC governs university curriculum.

3. Result: No unified policy, overlapping jurisdictions, and inconsistent quality standards.

What Does the National Education Policy 2020 Say?

The NEP 2020, launched by the Ministry of Education, recommends:

1. Four-year undergraduate degrees

2. Multidisciplinary curricula

3. Multiple exit options

4. Entry-level employment readiness

The PIL argues that law education has failed to adapt to these recommendations. By retaining rigid formats, it continues to be inaccessible and outdated.

Legal Giants Who Benefited from Early Start

The petition makes a compelling emotional and historical argument by pointing out how great Indian jurists started early in life:

These examples highlight that longer degrees are not necessarily better, and early engagement with the legal field can lead to outstanding contributions.

Arguments Against the Current Legal Education Structure

The PIL raises several systemic problems:

• Commercialisation of legal education, especially by private colleges

• Inadequate infrastructure and faculty in many law schools

• Outdated curriculum, not aligned with modern legal needs like tech law, AI, IP, and cybercrime

• Rigid examination systems, which don’t assess practical legal skills

• Insufficient internship opportunities, particularly in tier-2 and tier-3 cities

What Could Change If the PIL Succeeds?

If the Supreme Court agrees with the PIL and asks for restructuring, several positive outcomes may follow:

1. Shorter, Flexible Law Degrees

1. Introduce four-year LL.B aligned with NEP.

2. Allow credit transfers, lateral entries, and exit points.

2. Affordable Education

1. Cap tuition fees at public institutions.

2. Scholarships and education loans for students from marginalised communities.

3. Skill-Oriented Learning

1. Emphasis on clinical legal education, moot courts, legal aid work.

2. Integration of legal tech, ethics, and policy making in the curriculum.

4. Unified Regulation

• Set up a Law Education Commission to:

  1. Design curriculum standards

  2. Accredit law schools

  3. Conduct national legal education audits

5. Early Professional Start

1. Reduce unnecessary academic delays.

2. Let students join litigation or corporate law earlier.

Concerns from the Legal Education Community

While reform sounds promising, several experts have expressed caution:

1. Risk of Diluting Quality

• Shorter degrees may compromise on legal depth and rigor.

2. Regulatory Overlap

• Adding another regulator could increase bureaucracy, unless powers are clearly defined.

3. One Size Doesn’t Fit All

• India’s legal education needs regional flexibility, not just top-down reforms.

4. Implementation Delays

• Even if reforms are approved, rollout across 1500+ law colleges may take years.

What Do Law Students Think?

Many law students have welcomed the PIL, especially those from rural or middle-class backgrounds. Here’s what some of them had to say:

1. “If fees are regulated and law degrees made shorter, I can start supporting my family sooner.”

2. “We want practice-based learning, not just theory-heavy semesters.”

3. “Why is legal education so expensive when the aim is to uphold justice and equality?”

These voices are a powerful reminder of why education reforms should be people-centric.

International Comparison: How Long Is Law School Elsewhere?

The petition uses these comparisons to argue that India’s structure is needlessly long and expensive.

What Happens on September 9, 2025?

On this date, the Supreme Court will review responses from the Centre, BCI, UGC, and others. The judges will consider:

1. Whether the current model violates the Right to Equality and Right to Education

2. Whether there's a need for a Law Education Commission

3. Whether legal education should align with NEP 2020

The judgment could become a turning point for legal education in India.

Conclusion: Legal Reform or Missed Opportunity?

This PIL presents a historic opportunity to democratise legal education. By reducing course duration, regulating fees, and improving quality, the legal profession could become more inclusive, future-ready, and socially impactful.

Whether the Supreme Court pushes for a Legal Education Commission or recommends changes through existing bodies, one thing is clear — legal education in India cannot remain frozen in time.

It must evolve with the needs of the society it serves.