Blog

Also Read: Navigating Prenuptial Agreements in India: Legal Insights for 2025

What Is a Prenuptial Agreement?

A prenuptial agreement is a written contract signed by two people before they get married. It typically sets out:

1. How assets, property, and business interests will be divided in case of divorce or separation.

2. Responsibilities for debts and liabilities.

3. Terms for alimony or spousal maintenance.

4. Clauses related to child custody and inheritance.

5. Financial obligations during the marriage.

Global Perspective

Prenups are common in countries like the United States, Canada, the UK, and Australia, where marriage is often viewed as a legal contract rather than a purely religious or sacramental union. These agreements help minimize conflict and provide a sense of financial security to both partners.

In India, however, marriage is still largely seen as a sacred bond, especially under Hindu personal law, which makes the acceptance and enforcement of prenups more complicated.

Also Read: Protect Your Family: 10 Ways a Family Lawyer Can Assist You

Legal Framework for Prenuptial Agreements in India

1. Absence of Specific Legislation

Unlike Western countries, India does not have a dedicated law that governs or recognizes prenuptial agreements.
Family laws in India are primarily governed by religion-based statutes such as:

1. The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

2. The Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872

3. The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937

4. The Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936

None of these laws expressly recognize prenuptial agreements.

2. Marriage as a Sacrament vs. Contract

1. Under Hindu law, marriage is traditionally regarded as a sacrament (sanskara) — a sacred and lifelong bond.

   Hence, pre-deciding the consequences of a potential breakdown of marriage is often viewed as against public policy.

2. Under Muslim law, marriage is seen as a contract, and certain conditions can be included in the Nikah Nama (marriage contract). Yet, Indian courts have been reluctant to enforce prenups that go beyond customary provisions such as mehr.

This religious dimension has made prenups difficult to mainstream in Indian society.

3. Indian Contract Act, 1872

Prenuptial agreements are often tested against the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which lays down rules for valid contracts.
Key points include:

1. A valid contract requires lawful consideration and object (Section 23).

2. Agreements against public policy are void.

3. Contracts that encourage divorce or restrict marital rights have often been struck down.

Since prenups usually don’t involve monetary consideration and may appear to anticipate divorce, they often fail the test of enforceability under the Contract Act.

4. The Unique Case of Goa

The state of Goa is an exception because it follows the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867.
Under this code:

1. Couples can choose between community property and separation of property regimes before marriage.

2. Their choice is recorded as a legally binding prenup.

3. This system is unique in India and shows that prenups can be integrated into the legal framework where legislatively permitted.

Also Read: The Key to a Healthy Intimate Relationship: Insights and Guidance

Judicial Approach to Prenuptial Agreements in India

Indian courts have historically been conservative about enforcing prenups, but there are signs of change.

Early Judicial Resistance

1. Tekait Man Mohini Jemadi v. Basanta Kumar Singh (Calcutta HC)
   The court held that an agreement limiting the husband’s rights under Hindu law was void because it was against public policy.

2. Krishna Aiyar v. Balammal (Madras HC)
   A prenup allowing the wife to live separately while receiving financial support was struck down as it violated the conjugal rights provided under Hindu law.

Cases Showing Flexibility

1. Pran Mohan Das v. Hari Mohan Das (Calcutta HC)
   The court upheld a prenup concerning property distribution because it did not encourage divorce or violate public policy.

2. Mohd. Khan v. Mst. Shahmal (J&K HC)
   A prenup requiring the husband to stay at his wife’s parental home and compensate for wedding expenses if he left was deemed valid, as it aligned with customary practices.

3. Recent Family Court Observations

   1. In 2023, a Family Court in Delhi observed that it might be time to make prenups compulsory for clarity and transparency in marriages.

   2. Some courts in cities like Mumbai and Delhi have started considering prenups as evidence of the couple’s intent during divorce proceedings, even though they are not legally binding.

Key Judicial Takeaway

While prenups do not have statutory recognition, courts are slowly showing pragmatic acceptance, especially when the agreements:

1. Are fair and not one-sided.

2. Do not contravene personal laws or encourage divorce.

3. Clearly reflect mutual consent.

Also Read: New Rules For Divorce In India 2024: A Comprehensive Guide

Public Policy Concerns

Indian courts often strike down prenups on the ground of public policy.
This is because:

1. They may be perceived as promoting divorce or undermining the sanctity of marriage.

2. They may restrict the legal rights of a spouse granted under personal laws.

The challenge lies in balancing personal autonomy and cultural-religious notions of marriage.

Also Read: How To Apply For Divorce

Relevance of Prenuptial Agreements in Modern India

Despite their uncertain legal standing, prenups are gaining attention due to changes in society and family structures.

1. Protection of Assets

With rising entrepreneurship and wealth accumulation, couples increasingly want to safeguard personal or inherited assets. A prenup can clarify what remains individual property and what becomes joint.

2. Transparency in Finances

Prenups encourage open discussion about income, liabilities, and shared expenses, reducing financial misunderstandings later in the marriage.

3. Alimony and Maintenance

Divorce proceedings often get prolonged due to disputes over alimony and maintenance. Prenups can reduce litigation by pre-deciding these terms.

4. Second Marriages and Blended Families

For individuals entering a second marriage, prenups can protect the inheritance rights of children from previous marriages.

5. Reduced Litigation and Emotional Stress

By clarifying expectations and obligations, prenups can help avoid long court battles, saving emotional and financial costs.

6. Global Marriages

As more Indians marry NRIs or foreigners, prenups often serve as a bridge between different legal systems, helping resolve cross-border disputes over property and custody.

Also Read: Divorce Law in India

Challenges in Enforcing Prenuptial Agreements in India

Prenups face significant hurdles in India due to:

1. Lack of specific legislation, leading to uncertainty in enforceability.

2. Conflicts with personal laws, particularly Hindu marriage laws.

3. Social stigma viewing prenups as unromantic or distrustful.

4. Gender bias, where historically women were seen as financially dependent, making prenups appear unfair to them.

5. Judicial inconsistency, where outcomes depend on individual judges’ interpretations.

Also Read: Fastest Divorce Process : How To Get A Quick Divorce

How to Draft a Fair Prenuptial Agreement

Although prenups are not yet legally binding in most parts of India, couples still opt for them as a precautionary document.
To increase the chances of being upheld in court, a prenup should:

1. Be drafted with the assistance of qualified lawyers.

2. Clearly specify:

   1. Individual and joint assets.

   2. Financial responsibilities during marriage.

   3. Provisions for alimony and maintenance.

   4. Arrangements for children from previous relationships.

3. Be fair and equitable to both parties.

4. Be registered as a contract (even though it may still face challenges).

5. Be executed voluntarily without coercion or undue influence.

6. Avoid clauses that violate personal laws or encourage divorce.

International Comparison: Lessons for India

Countries like the US, Canada, and Australia recognize prenups as binding contracts, provided they meet certain standards of fairness and transparency.
India can learn from these jurisdictions to:

1. Draft a uniform civil framework for marital agreements.

2. Ensure gender-neutral fairness and protection for vulnerable spouses.

3. Promote prenups as tools of financial planning rather than mistrust.

The Future of Prenuptial Agreements in India

With rising divorce rates, growing financial independence, and evolving judicial attitudes, there is a growing need to:

1. Introduce legislation recognizing prenups as enforceable under certain conditions.

2. Encourage mandatory financial disclosures before marriage.

3. Educate couples about the benefits of prenups to reduce stigma.

4. Offer judicial training for consistent interpretation.

If India were to enact a Marital Property Agreement Law, it could provide much-needed clarity and protection for both partners.

Conclusion

Prenuptial agreements in India remain in a legal grey zone.
While they lack explicit statutory recognition (except in Goa), societal changes and evolving judicial attitudes are opening the door for their gradual acceptance.

For couples — especially those with significant personal assets, second marriages, or cross-border relationships — a prenup offers clarity, transparency, and peace of mind.
However, until India enacts specific legislation for prenuptial agreements, couples must approach them as precautionary and advisory tools rather than guaranteed enforceable contracts.

The growing discourse around prenups reflects the modernization of marriage in India, shifting from a purely sacred union to one that also recognizes financial and legal realities. A clear legal framework could bridge this gap, benefiting both spouses and reducing marital disputes.

People Also Read: New Rules For Divorce In India 2024: A Comprehensive Guide

Why This Judgment Matters

Before this ruling, many alimony payments did not keep up with rising living costs. Women who were financially dependent on their husbands often received low maintenance amounts that were not enough to support the lifestyle they had during marriage. This judgment changes that by:

1. Increasing the monthly alimony to a more reasonable figure

2. Including automatic increases every two years

3. Giving long-term residential security through property transfer

It sends a strong message that divorced spouses, especially women who stay unmarried, deserve financial stability and dignity after separation.

People Also Read: How To Apply For Divorce

The Story Behind the Case

Timeline:

1. Married in: 1997

2. Separated in: 2007

3. Divorce finalized in: 2019

Rakhi Sadhukhan had been fighting a legal battle for over 17 years. Initially, she was awarded ₹8,000/month as interim maintenance in 2010. This was increased to ₹20,000/month by the Calcutta High Court in 2016. But Rakhi argued that this amount was still too low, especially considering inflation and her standard of living during the marriage.

Her ex-husband, Raja Sadhukhan, claimed that he had limited income, responsibilities from a second marriage, and elderly parents to support. He also argued that their son, now an adult, was no longer dependent.

People Also Read: Comprehensive Guide to Divorce Documents in India: A Step-by-Step Approach

What the Supreme Court Decided

The Supreme Court reviewed all the facts and gave a clear, strong judgment:

1. Monthly Alimony Raised to ₹50,000: This is more than double the previous amount.

2. 5% Increase Every 2 Years: To adjust for inflation and rising costs of living.

3. Home Ownership Given to Wife: The court ordered that the shared flat must be transferred to Rakhi’s name. The husband must also clear any outstanding home loan.

This combination of regular payments and property ownership ensures that Rakhi will have both income and a place to live, offering her long-term security.

People Also Read: Fastest Divorce Process : How To Get A Quick Divorce

Court’s Stand on Standard of Living

The court said that alimony is not just about survival. It should reflect the lifestyle the wife had during the marriage. This means courts must consider:

1. Quality of home

2. Healthcare access

3. Social and travel habits

4. Educational and personal development opportunities

This marks a shift in mindset: from viewing alimony as a handout to treating it as a way to maintain continuity in lifestyle.

People Also Read: Grounds of Divorce for Husband in India

Income Will Be Examined Closely

The court also made it clear that the paying spouse’s entire financial history will now matter. This includes:

1. Current salary

2. Past earnings

3. Undeclared income

4. Investments and assets

The husband’s excuse of a second marriage and aged parents was rejected. The court said that remarriage cannot be used to reduce support to the first wife.

This ensures fairness and stops people from hiding income to avoid paying fair alimony.

Inflation-Linked Alimony: Why It Matters

A major highlight of the judgment is the 5% hike in maintenance every two years. This is important because:

1. Traditional alimony amounts remained fixed

2. Cost of living keeps rising

3. Going back to court for revisions is time-consuming

Now, the increase is automatic. This provides security and avoids future legal battles.

People Also Read: Alimony Explained How To Calculate Alimony Maintenance In India

Property Instead of Monthly Payments

Another big takeaway is that the court allowed property to be used as part of the alimony. The marital home will now belong to the wife. This helps:

1. Avoid monthly payment issues

2. Ensure long-term shelter

3. Reduce stress and court follow-ups

This idea could become more common in future divorce settlements, especially in big cities where rents are high.

People Also Read: In a historic judgement, Supreme Court provides guidelines for deciding compensation and maintenance in matrimonial cases

Encouraging Quick Settlements

This case shows that long court battles can backfire. Initially, Rakhi got ₹8,000/month. Over the years, this was increased to ₹75,000/month when the husband failed to appear in court in 2023.

This shows that delays can lead to higher financial burdens. It also encourages both parties to settle early and fairly.

Maintenance vs. Inheritance

The court also made an important point: maintenance and inheritance are not the same. Divorce does not affect a child’s right to ancestral property.

This clarity helps avoid confusion and protects children’s future rights.

People Also Read: Understanding the Legal Rights of Women in Divorce Cases in India

Impact on Future Divorce Cases

This ruling will change how alimony is awarded in India:

1. Standard of living will be the key factor

2. Past and present income will be examined in detail

3. Inflation-linked increases may become standard

4. Property can be awarded instead of or in addition to monthly cash

Women who were underpaid in previous cases may now have a stronger case to request fairer terms.

People Also Read: Permanent and Interim Maintenance in Void Marriages: Legal Rights & Provisions

Final Thoughts

The Supreme Court’s decision in this case is a big step toward fairness in divorce settlements. It recognizes the years that many women dedicate to their families without earning income, and ensures that they are not left without support after a marriage ends.

This case is not just about one woman. It’s about setting a new standard—one where financial dignity after divorce is not optional, but necessary.

As we look ahead to 2024, it's essential to understand the evolution of divorce  laws in India through appropriate legislation and judicial activism. 

Let’s check out some of the key changes that are now changing the whole landscape of Divorce laws in India: 

1. Waiving the 6-Month Waiting Period:  The Supreme Court, in a judgment passed by Justices Indira Banerjee and J. K. Maheshwari on December 11, 2021, stated that it has the power to make an exception to the 6-month waiting period usually required for divorce by mutual consent under Hindu law. In the case of Amit Kumar v. Suman Beniwal, the court said that under Article 142 of the Constitution, which allows the Supreme Court to pass any order necessary to do complete justice, it can waive the 6-month "cooling off" period on a case-by-case basis. Normally, under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, when a couple files for divorce by mutual consent, they have to wait for 6 months after the initial filing before the divorce can be finalized. This waiting period is meant to give the couple a chance to reconsider their decision. However, the Supreme Court has now clarified that it has the discretion to do away with this waiting period in appropriate cases to allow the divorce to be finalized sooner, using its special powers under Article 142 of the Constitution.

People Also Read: Cruelty As A Ground For Divorce

2. Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage: In a latest judgment passed on on May 6th 2024, The Supreme Court in JATINDER KUMAR SAPRA  Vs. ANUPAMA SAPRA 2024 the Supreme Court invoked its special powers under Article 142(1) to grant divorce on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown of marriage, considering the long period of separation, the impossibility of reconciliation, and the fact that the children are now adults and independent.

 People Also read: Desertion As A Ground For Divorce In India

Following were the key observations: 

a) After being prima facie satisfied that the case met certain parameters, requested Senior Counsel to assist in resolving the dispute and despite best efforts  the parties were unwilling to reach an amicable settlement and there was no possibility of them residing together. Senior counsel  submitted a note detailing his efforts, including discussions between the parties regarding the quantum of permanent alimony to be paid by the Appellant to the Respondent.

b) The Court observed that the undisputed facts reveal that the parties have been separated for 22 years, having last cohabited in January 2002. Their children are now majors and gainfully employed. Considering the totality of circumstances, the Court was satisfied that the marriage between the parties has irretrievably broken down and there is no possibility of them cohabiting in the future. The Court found that continuing the formal union was neither justified nor desirable. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the allegations made by the parties against each other, the Supreme Court deemed it appropriate to exercise its discretion under Article 142(1) of the Constitution of India and passed a decree of divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage. 

3. Maintenance for Live-In Partners: The Supreme Court of India has made several significant rulings in recent years that have affirmed the legal status and rights of individuals in live-in relationships.

In the groundbreaking case of S. Khushboo vs. Kanniammal & Anr. (April 28, 2010), the apex court held that live-in relationships and pre-marital sex are not illegal in India. The court emphasized that living together is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. Furthermore, the Supreme Court has also upheld the property rights of women in live-in relationships. In the case of Dhannulal and Others vs. Ganeshram and Another (April 08, 2015), the court ruled that a woman has the right to inherit her deceased live-in partner's property, even if they were not legally married. The court based its decision on earlier precedents which held that if a couple has been cohabiting for a long time, their relationship is presumed to be a marriage in the eyes of the law. This principle was also affirmed in the case of Vidyadhari & Ors. vs. Sukhrana Bai & Ors. (January 22, 2008), where the Supreme Court held that a woman living with a man in a live-in relationship has the right to inherit her partner's property. These landmark judgments have helped to establish the legal recognition and protection of live-in relationships in India, ensuring that individuals in such relationships are not denied their fundamental rights and are treated on par with married couples in certain respects, particularly in matters of property inheritance.

You May Also Read: Divorce Procedure In India

4. Adultery No Longer a Crime: In a significant decision in 2018, the Supreme Court of India decriminalized adultery, striking it off from the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The judgment was delivered by a five-judge Constitution Bench headed by the then Chief Justice of India, Dipak Misra, and included current CJI D. Y. Chandrachud and Justices A. M. Khanwilkar, R. F. Nariman, and Indu Malhotra. The case, Joseph Shine v. Union of India, began in 2017 when a non-resident Indian from Kerala filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the constitutional validity of the adultery law under Section 497 of the IPC and Section 198(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). The law, as it stood, punished a man with up to five years of imprisonment for having sexual relations with another man's wife. However, the wife who consented to the act was exempt from prosecution. Moreover, the law did not apply to a married man who had sexual relations with an unmarried woman or a widow. Interestingly, only the husband of the adulterous wife could file a complaint under Section 198(2) of the CrPC.

The Supreme Court held that adultery should not be considered a criminal offense, although it remains a valid ground for divorce in civil law. The Court's decision was based on the principles of gender equality and personal liberty. In 2020, another five-judge Bench led by former CJI Sharad A Bobde dismissed petitions seeking a review of the verdict, stating that they lacked merit.

People Also Read: Adultery as a Ground of Divorce in India

5. Triple Talaq Banned: In a landmark decision on August 22, 2017, the Supreme Court of India declared the practice of Triple Talaq unconstitutional. Triple Talaq was a controversial practice that allowed Muslim men to divorce their wives instantly by saying the word "talaq" three times in quick succession. The ruling was made by a panel of five judges, with three of them agreeing that the practice violated the fundamental rights of Muslim women and was, therefore, unconstitutional, while the other two judges upheld its constitutionality. The Supreme Court emphasized that Triple Talaq gave husbands the power to end their marriages unilaterally and arbitrarily, without considering the wishes or rights of their wives. This practice, the court argued, went against the core principles of equality, dignity, and individual rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution. By allowing men to divorce their wives at their own whim, Triple Talaq undermined the notion of gender equality and violated the dignity of Muslim women. The court's decision was based on the belief that such a practice had no place in a modern, democratic society that values equal rights for all its citizens, regardless of gender. The ruling aimed to protect the rights of Muslim women and ensure that they are treated with the same respect and dignity as their male counterparts. This historic judgment marked a significant step towards gender equality and the empowerment of Muslim women in India.

People Also Read: Muslim Marriage Law In India

6. Civil Courts Override Personal Laws: The Supreme Court, in the case of Molly Joseph vs George Sebastian, firmly established that the dissolution of a marriage can only be carried out by a competent court. This means that any divorce granted by a religious institution, such as the Christian Church, or under any personal law, is not legally valid. In other words, even if a couple obtains a divorce through their religious or personal legal systems, it will not be recognized by the Indian legal system unless a Civil Court also grants the divorce. The order or decree issued by the Civil Court takes precedence and supersedes any order passed by a religious authority or personal law tribunal.

You May Also Read: Fastest Divorce Process : How To Get A Quick Divorce

People Also Read: What is Divorce Mediation

The Latest Legislative Amendment “The Marriage Laws (amendment) Bill, 2013”.

Excerpts from the Marriage Laws (amendment) Bill, 2013

New sections are added 13C, 13D and 13E. Divorce on ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage.

‘13C

(1) A petition for the dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce may be

presented to the district court by either party to a marriage [whether solemnized before or after the commencement of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 2013], on the ground that the marriage has broken down irretrievably.

(2) The court hearing a petition referred to in sub-section (1) shall not hold the

marriage to have broken down irretrievably unless it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage have lived apart for a continuous period of not less than three years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition. 

(3) If the court is satisfied, on the evidence as to the fact mentioned in subsection (2), then, unless it is satisfied on all the evidence that the marriage has not broken down irretrievably, it shall, subject to the provisions of this Act, grant a decree of divorce.

(4) In considering, for the purpose of sub-section (2), whether the period forwhich the parties to a marriage have lived apart has been continuous, no account shall be taken of any one period (not exceeding three months’ in all) during which the parties resumed living with each other, but no other period during which the parties lived with each other shall count as part of the period for which the parties to the marriage lived apart. 

(5) For the purposes of sub-sections (2) and (4), a husband and wife shall be treated as living apart unless they are living with each other in the same household, and reference in this section to the parties to a marriage living with each other shall be construed as reference to their living with each other in the same household.

(c) children who, because of special condition of their physical or mental health, need looking after and do not have the financial resources to support themselves.

‘13F 

(1) Without prejudice to any custom or usage or any other law for the time being in force, the court may, at the time of passing of the decree under section 13C on a petition made by the wife, order that the husband shall give for her and children as defined in section 13E, such compensation which shall include a share in his share of the immovable property (other than inherited or inheritable immovable property) and such amount by way of share in movable property, if any, towards the settlement of her claim, as the court may deem just and equitable, and while determining such compensation the court shall take into account the value of inherited or inheritable property of the husband. (2) Any order of settlement made by the court under sub-section (1) shall be secured, if necessary, by a charge on the immovable property of the husband.’.

In the Special Marriage Act, 1954 (hereafter in this Chapter referred to as the Special Marriage Act), in section 28, in sub-section (2), the following provisos shall be inserted,

Namely:- 

‘‘Provided that on an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under this sub-section to a lesser period and the court may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties, if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences: Provided further that where one of the parties fails to appear before the court within a period of three years from the date of presentation of the petition under sub-section (1), the court may, on an application made by the other party, waive the requirement of moving the motion by both the parties.’’.

After section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, the following sections shall be inserted,

namely:—  

‘28A.

 (1) A petition for the dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce may be presented to the district court by either party to a marriage [whether solemnized before or after the commencement of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 2013] on the ground that the marriage has broken down irretrievably. 

(2) The court hearing a petition referred to in sub-section (1) shall not hold the marriage to have broken down irretrievably unless it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage have lived apart for a continuous period of not less than three years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition. 

(3) If the court is satisfied, on the evidence as to the fact mentioned in subsection(2), then, unless it is satisfied on all the evidence that the marriage has not broken down irretrievably, it shall, subject to the provisions of this Act, grant a decree of divorce. 

(4) In considering, for the purpose of sub-section (2), whether the period for which the parties to a marriage have lived apart has been continuous, no account shall be taken of any one period (not exceeding three months in all) during which the parties resumed living with each other, but no other period during which the parties lived with each other shall count as part of the period for which the parties to the marriage lived apart. (5) For the purposes of sub-sections (2) and (4), a husband and wife shall be treated as living apart unless they are living with each other in the same household, and reference in this section to the parties to a marriage living with each other shall be construed as reference to their living with each other in the same household. 

‘28B

(1) Where the wife is the respondent to a petition for the dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce under section 28A, she may oppose the grant of a decree on the ground that the dissolution of the marriage will result in grave financial hardship to her and that it would, in all the circumstances, be wrong to dissolve the marriage. 

(2) Where the grant of a decree is opposed by virtue of this section, then,—

(a) if the court finds that the petitioner is entitled to rely on the ground set out in section 28A;  and (b) if, apart from this section, the court would grant a decree on the petition, the court shall consider all the circumstances, including the conduct of the parties to the marriage and the interests of those parties and of any children or other persons concerned, and if, the court is of the opinion that the dissolution of the marriage shall result in grave financial hardship to the respondent and that it would, in all the circumstances, be wrong to dissolve the marriage, it shall dismiss the petition, or in an appropriate case stay the proceedings until arrangements have been made to its satisfaction to eliminate the hardship.

‘28C. 

The court shall not pass a decree of divorce under section 28A unless the court is satisfied that adequate provision for the maintenance of children born out of the marriage has been made consistently with the financial capacity of the parties to the marriage.

Explanation.— In this section, the expression “children” means—

(a) minor children including adopted children;

(b) unmarried or widowed daughters who have not the financial resources to support themselves; and

(c) children who, because of special condition of their physical or mental health, need looking after and do not have the financial resources to support themselves.

‘28D

(1) Without prejudice to any custom or usage or any other law for the time being in force, the court may, at the time of passing of the decree under section 28A on a petition made by the wife, order that the husband shall give for her and children as defined in section 28C, such compensation which shall include a share in his share of the immovable property (other than inherited or inheritable immovable property) and such amount by way of share in movable property, if any, towards the settlement of her claim, as the court may deem just and equitable, and while determining such compensation the court shall take into account the value of inherited or inheritable property of the husband.

(2) Any order of settlement made by the court under sub-section (1) shall be secured, if necessary, by a charge on the immovable property of the husband.'

The bill introduces significant changes to the existing divorce laws in India, making the process more streamlined while also providing safeguards for the financial interests of the wife and children involved. The document is titled "The Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2013" and was passed by the Rajya Sabha on August 26, 2013. The bill aims to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.

People Also Read: Grounds of Divorce for Husband in India

Key points of the bill: 

1.  It allows the court to reduce the waiting period for divorce by mutual consent from the current six months, and waive the requirement for both parties to move the motion if they are unable to reconcile their differences.

2.  It introduces the concept of "irretrievable breakdown of marriage" as a ground for divorce. If the parties have lived apart for a continuous period of at least three years, the court may grant a divorce on this ground.

3.  The bill provides safeguards for the wife, allowing her to oppose the divorce petition on the grounds that it would cause grave financial hardship. The court must consider all circumstances before granting the divorce in such cases.

4.  The court must ensure that adequate provisions are made for the maintenance of children born out of the marriage before granting a divorce.

5.  The wife may be entitled to a share in the husband's immovable property (other than inherited or inheritable property) and movable property as compensation during the divorce proceedings. 

Why it is a important to take Legal Advice on Divorce matters 

a) When facing the life-altering decision of divorce, it is imperative to seek the guidance of a qualified legal professional. The intricacies of the divorce process, including property division, alimony, child custody, and support, can be overwhelming and emotionally taxing. Without proper legal counsel, you may find yourself at a significant disadvantage, leading to unfavorable outcomes that can have long-lasting consequences on your financial stability and personal well-being.

b) An experienced divorce lawyer is an invaluable asset during this challenging time. They possess the knowledge and expertise to guide you through the legal labyrinth, ensuring that you fully understand your rights and obligations. With their deep understanding of local court systems, judges, and precedents, a skilled attorney can provide you with a realistic assessment of your case and help you set achievable goals.

c) Moreover, a divorce lawyer can serve as a powerful advocate and negotiator on your behalf. They can engage in constructive discussions with your spouse or their legal representative, working towards a fair and equitable settlement that safeguards your interests. In the event that negotiations break down, your lawyer will be prepared to vigorously argue your case in court, presenting compelling evidence and arguments to support your position.

d) Investing in legal advice during a divorce is not just a matter of protecting your rights; it is also a means of preserving your emotional well-being. By entrusting your case to a knowledgeable attorney, you can alleviate the burden of navigating the legal system alone, allowing you to focus on healing and building a new chapter in your life.

People Also Read: How To Apply For Divorce

Conclusion:

seeking legal advice on divorce matters is a critical step in ensuring that your voice is heard, your rights are protected, and your future is secure. Do not leave the outcome of your divorce to chance; arm yourself with the power of legal expertise and take control of your destiny.

 People Also Read: The Role of a Family Dispute Lawyer in Protecting Your    Rights During Divorce

Divorce can be complex and emotionally demanding, yet grasping the legal procedures involved can help alleviate some of the stress. In India, where divorce laws vary based on religion and personal circumstances, navigating the process can be particularly daunting. This guide will provide you with a thorough overview of the steps involved in filing for divorce process in India, covering the various forms of divorce, reasons for divorce, procedures, necessary paperwork, significant legal concerns, and legal advice.

What are the different types of divorces in India?

In India, divorces are governed by various personal laws, depending on one's religion and marital status. The primary types of divorces include:

Hindu Marriage Act: 

This law governs marriages solemnised under Hindu rites and applies to Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, and Buddhists. Under this act, the divorce procedure in India involves filing a petition in the family court or district court citing grounds such as cruelty, adultery, desertion, etc. Mediation and counselling may be required to explore reconciliation before the court grants a decree of divorce.

Muslim Personal Law

Divorces among Muslims are governed by Sharia law, which recognises various forms of divorce, including oral pronouncement (Talaq) or written document (Talaqnama). In case of disputes, an arbitration council may intervene to facilitate reconciliation. It's essential to register the divorce with the relevant authority for legal validity.

Christian Marriage Act

Christians in India are governed by this law, which allows for divorce on grounds such as adultery, cruelty, desertion, etc. The procedure involves filing a petition in the family court or district court, followed by mediation and counselling efforts. After due consideration of the evidence presented, the court grants a decree of divorce.

Special Marriage Act

This law applies to interfaith marriages or marriages solemnised under this act. Partners have the option to file a joint petition for divorce, citing reasons such as mutual consent, cruelty, and more. There's a mandatory six-month waiting period after filing, during which reconciliation efforts may be made. The court issues a decree of legal divorce upon satisfaction of legal requirements.

Grounds for taking divorce:

In India, grounds for divorce serve as the legal basis upon which a spouse can seek to dissolve their marriage. The specific grounds vary depending on the applicable law, which could be the Hindu Marriage Act, Muslim Personal Law, Christian Marriage Act, or Special Marriage Act. Here are some common grounds for divorce recognised across different laws:

Cruelty:

Cruelty refers to any physical or mental harm inflicted upon one spouse by the other, making it difficult or impossible for them to continue living together harmoniously. Physical cruelty includes acts of violence, abuse, or harassment, while mental cruelty encompasses emotional abuse, constant harassment, verbal insults, or threats. The cruelty must be severe and persistent enough to render cohabitation unbearable.

People Also Read This: Cruelty As A Ground For Divorce

Adultery:

When one spouse has a sexual encounter outside of marriage, they are committing adultery and betraying the trust and faithfulness that are anticipated in a married partnership. It involves extramarital affairs or infidelity by one spouse, which undermines the foundation of the marriage. Adultery is considered a breach of marital vows and can be grounds for legal divorce, although proving adultery can be challenging and requires substantial evidence.

People Also Read This: Adultery as a Ground of Divorce in India

Desertion:

Desertion refers to the intentional abandonment of one spouse by the other without reasonable cause or justification. It involves the cessation of cohabitation and the refusal to fulfil marital obligations without any valid reason. Desertion can be physical (where one spouse physically leaves the marital home) or constructive (where one spouse denies to engage in marital relations or provide support). The deserted spouse may petition for divorce on grounds of desertion after a specified period of separation.

People Also Read This: Desertion As A Ground For Divorce In India

Conversion:

Conversion entails one spouse adopting a different religion without obtaining consent from the other spouse. In interfaith marriages, religious differences can sometimes lead to conflicts and strains within the relationship. If one spouse unilaterally converts to another religion without the partner's consent, it may be considered a breach of trust and a ground for divorce. The conversion must be significant enough to disrupt marital harmony and affect the fundamental aspects of the marriage.

Mental disorder:

Mental disorder or insanity refers to a condition where one spouse suffers from a severe and incurable mental illness that significantly impairs their ability to fulfil marital obligations or maintain a normal relationship with their partner. Such conditions may include schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, severe depression, or other psychiatric disorders. If the mental disorder is deemed incurable and renders cohabitation impossible or detrimental to the well-being of the other spouse, it may serve as grounds for divorce.

In summary, these grounds for the divorce process represent severe breaches of the marital relationship that can justify the dissolution of marriage under Indian law. Individuals seeking divorce must provide sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims and demonstrate that the grounds for divorce exist as per the applicable legal provisions.

Procedures for different types of divorces:

Wondering how to get a divorce in India can feel overwhelming. Understanding the divorce procedure is essential for a smooth legal process. Let's explore step-by-step guidelines for various types of divorces, addressing the query, "What is the procedure for divorce in India?"

1. Hindu Marriage Act:

   • Initiating the Process: Begin by filing a petition in the family court or district court, outlining the reasons for divorce and furnishing essential information.

   • Mediation and counselling: Courts may refer parties to mediation or counselling to explore reconciliation before proceeding with the divorce process.

   • Evidence and trial: Parties present evidence supporting their claims during court hearings, after which the court pronounces a decree of divorce if satisfied.

2. Muslim Personal Law:

   • Oral or written pronouncement: Divorce can be initiated through oral pronouncement (Talaq) or a written document (Talaqnama) as per Sharia law.

   • Arbitration council: In case of disputes, an arbitration council may intervene to facilitate reconciliation between parties.

   • Registration: It's essential to register the divorce with the relevant authority for legal validity and documentation purposes.

3. Christian Marriage Act:

   • Filing a petition: Similar to other laws, the process involves filing a petition in the family court or district court, citing grounds for divorce.

   • Mediation and counselling: Courts may encourage parties to undergo mediation or counselling to explore possibilities of reconciliation.

   • Decree of divorce: After considering evidence and arguments, the court grants a decree of divorce, officially ending the marriage.

4. Special Marriage Act:

   • Joint petition: Couples file a joint petition for divorce, stating grounds such as mutual consent, cruelty, etc.

   • Waiting period: There is a mandatory six-month waiting period after filing, during which reconciliation efforts may be made.

   • Decree of divorce: Upon satisfaction of legal requirements, the court issues a decree of divorce, formalising the end of the marriage.

Documents required:

• Marriage certificate: Proof of marriage solemnisation.

• Residence proof: Address verification of both spouses.

• Identification proof: Valid identification documents.

• Evidence supporting grounds for divorce: Any relevant documentation or witnesses.

• Financial documents: Details of assets, liabilities, income, etc., for asset division.

Things to remember during divorce:

• Seek legal advice: Consult with a qualified lawyer to understand your rights and obligations.

• Communication: Foster open and respectful dialogue with your spouse to ease the process.

• Children's well-being: Prioritise the best interests of children (if applicable) and work towards amicable custody arrangements.

• Emotional Support: Seek comfort from friends, family, or support groups to get through this challenging period.

• Document management: Keep all relevant documents organised and readily accessible for legal proceedings.

Also Read: Navigating Divorce Papers in India: Understanding Requirements and Legal Procedures

Essential judgments on divorce in India:

Amardeep Singh vs Harveen Kaur on 12 September, 2017

Scenario:

Amardeep Singh and Harveen Kaur sought a divorce in 2017 after encountering marital issues since their marriage in 2014. The case centred on the validity of their marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act, particularly regarding the mandatory waiting period for divorce.

Judgement:

In the significant case of Amardeep Singh vs. Harveen Kaur, the Supreme Court, on September 12, 2017, determined that the compulsory six-month waiting period for divorce by mutual agreement could be waived under certain conditions. The court held that if couples had been living separately for over 18 months and failed to reconcile, the waiting period could be waived.

Significance:

The judgment streamlined the divorce process in India, providing relief to couples by allowing for the waiver of the waiting period. This decision facilitated quicker resolutions for couples facing irretrievable breakdowns in their marriages and reflected the judiciary's responsiveness to evolving societal needs.

Samar Ghosh vs Jaya Ghosh on 26 March 2007

Scenario:

Samar Ghosh and Jaya Ghosh sought a divorce in 2007 due to significant marital issues. The case centred on the interpretation of "cruelty" under the Hindu Marriage Act 1955.

Judgement:

In the landmark case of Samar Ghosh vs Jaya Ghosh, the Supreme Court ruled on 26 March 2007 that "cruelty" in divorce cases includes various forms of behaviour causing mental and emotional anguish. The judgement provided a comprehensive definition of cruelty, emphasising its cumulative effect over time.

Significance:

The judgement clarified the interpretation of "cruelty" in divorce cases, ensuring broader protection for spouses facing mistreatment. It guided future decisions in marital disputes and facilitated more equitable outcomes in a divorce procedure in India, contributing to the development of family law jurisprudence.

Tips to Consider

1. Prioritise self-care: Focus on your physical, emotional, and mental well-being throughout the divorce process.

2. Negotiate fair terms: Aim for a fair and equitable settlement that addresses both parties' needs and concerns.

3. Stay informed: Stay updated on the legal proceedings and actively participate in decision-making processes.

4. Seek support: Don't hesitate to seek support from friends, family, or professional counsellors to navigate the emotional challenges.

5. Look ahead: Remember that obtaining a legal divorce signifies the closure of one chapter but also symbolises the start of a new beginning and chances for individual development.

Conclusion

Filing for a divorce is a significant life event that requires careful consideration and preparation. By understanding the legal procedures, rights, and responsibilities involved, individuals can navigate the process more effectively. If you find yourself in need of legal guidance or representation, seeking advice from experienced lawyers is crucial. For the best professional legal assistance, or if you're considering hiring a lawyer, you can reach out to LegalKart. They offer online legal consultations anytime, anywhere, providing expert guidance to help you through every step of the divorce process in India. Keep in mind you're not alone on this journey, and seeking appropriate legal assistance can significantly impact achieving a just and fair outcome.