Maintenance under Section 144 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: A Complete Guide
Divorce

Maintenance under Section 144 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: A Complete Guide

The law on maintenance in India is rooted in the principle that no family member should be left destitute due to neglect or refusal by another who has sufficient means. With the introduction of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the earlier provision of Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) has been replaced with Section 144 BNSS. This transition retains the spirit of social justice while bringing in more procedural clarity, inclusivity, and enforceability.

Understanding Section 144 BNSS

The main objective of Section 144 BNSS is to protect the financial rights of dependent family members such as wives, children, and parents. It allows a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class to direct a person with sufficient means to provide maintenance to dependents who cannot maintain themselves.

This provision reflects India’s commitment to social welfare, ensuring that no dependent family member suffers due to neglect or abandonment.

Key goals of Section 144 BNSS:

  1. Prevent destitution and homelessness of dependents

  2. Ensure financial security and dignity of dependents

  3. Provide a simple, fast, and enforceable legal remedy

  4. Promote family responsibility and social harmony

Who Can Claim Maintenance under Section 144 BNSS

Section 144 of the BNSS clearly defines the categories of people entitled to claim maintenance:

Wife

  1. A wife who is unable to maintain herself can claim maintenance from her husband.

  2. The term “wife” includes a divorced woman who has not remarried.

  3. If the husband remarries or lives with another woman, the wife’s refusal to live with him will be considered justified.

Minor Children

  1. Legitimate or illegitimate minor children, whether married or not, can claim maintenance if they cannot maintain themselves.

  2. Both sons and daughters are covered.

Children with Disabilities

  1. Adult children, legitimate or illegitimate, who are unable to maintain themselves due to physical or mental abnormality or injury can claim maintenance.

  2. Married daughters are not included in this category.

Parents

  1. Fathers or mothers who cannot maintain themselves can claim maintenance from their children.

  2. The obligation is not limited to sons; daughters are equally responsible.

Note: The provision is largely gender-neutral, allowing dependent parents and children to claim support from financially capable family members regardless of gender.

Key Features of Section 144 BNSS

Section 144 BNSS is not just a procedural replacement of Section 125 CrPC — it introduces clarity, timelines, and strengthened enforcement.

Judicial Authority

  1. The power to grant maintenance rests with a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class.

  2. Once neglect or refusal is proved, the Magistrate can order monthly maintenance at a reasonable rate.

Interim Maintenance

  1. During the pendency of the case, the Magistrate can grant interim maintenance and expenses of the proceedings.

  2. This ensures dependents don’t face financial hardship while the case is being decided.

  3. Interim maintenance should, as far as possible, be disposed of within 60 days from the date of service of notice.

Commencement of Maintenance

  1. Maintenance may be payable either from the date of the order or from the date of application, at the Magistrate’s discretion.

  2. This flexibility helps cover delays and ensures fairness.

Enforcement of Maintenance Orders

  1. If the defaulter fails to comply, the court can issue a warrant for recovery of the due amount.

  2. If the amount remains unpaid, the Magistrate can order imprisonment up to one month or until payment is made.

  3. A warrant must be issued within one year from the date the amount became due.

Justification for Refusal to Live Together

  1. If a husband offers to maintain his wife on the condition that she lives with him, and she refuses, the Magistrate must examine her reasons.

  2. If the refusal is justified (e.g., cruelty, second marriage, or ill-treatment), maintenance can still be granted.

Disqualifications for Claiming Maintenance

  1. A wife is not entitled to maintenance if:

    1. She is living in adultery.

    2. She refuses to live with her husband without sufficient reason.

    3. They are living separately by mutual consent.

  2. If these are proved after an order, the Magistrate must cancel the order.

Procedure for Seeking Maintenance

The procedure under Section 144 BNSS is designed to be accessible and efficient:

Step 1: Filing the Application

  1. The dependent person or their authorized representative files an application before the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class.

  2. The application should be filed in the jurisdiction where the respondent resides or last resided.

Step 2: Notice and Appearance

  1. The Magistrate issues a notice to the respondent.

  2. The respondent must appear and submit a reply.

Step 3: Evidence and Hearing

  1. Both parties present evidence of income, dependency, and neglect or refusal to maintain.

  2. Documentary proof such as income statements, bank records, or testimonies may be presented.

Step 4: Interim Maintenance

  • The Magistrate may order interim maintenance to ensure immediate support during the pendency of the case.

Step 5: Final Order

  1. Based on evidence, the Magistrate determines a reasonable monthly allowance.

  2. The order is binding and enforceable by law.

Factors Considered for Determining Maintenance Amount

While deciding the maintenance amount, the Magistrate considers:

  1. Income and financial status of the person liable to pay

  2. Reasonable needs of the dependent person

  3. Standard of living enjoyed during the relationship or marriage

  4. Number of dependents and existing liabilities of the payer

  5. Health condition and special needs of dependents

  6. Cost of living and inflation in the area

Example: If a husband earns ₹1 lakh per month and has no other dependents, the court may fix maintenance at around ₹25,000–₹30,000 for the wife, depending on circumstances.

The idea is to ensure the dependent lives with dignity and not in financial hardship.

Enforcement of Maintenance Orders under Section 144 BNSS

Section 144 provides strong enforcement tools to ensure compliance.

If the payer defaults:

  1. The Magistrate may issue a warrant to recover the amount like a fine under criminal law.

  2. If the amount remains unpaid, the person may face imprisonment up to one month for each month of default.

  3. Repeated defaults can lead to repeated imprisonment orders.

Protection for dependents:

  1. Dependents can approach the court again in case of non-payment.

  2. Legal remedies are available to secure arrears with interest if the court directs.

Modification and Cancellation of Orders

Maintenance orders are not permanent; they can be modified or canceled:

  • Change in financial circumstances: If the income or expenses of either party change, the Magistrate may revise the amount.

  • Remarriage of wife: Maintenance stops automatically if the wife remarries.

  • Adultery or mutual consent: Proven adultery or separation by consent can lead to cancellation of the order.

  • Change in dependent’s condition: If a child becomes financially independent, maintenance may be discontinued.

This flexibility keeps the system fair and relevant.

Judicial Interpretations and Landmark Cases

Judicial precedents have played a crucial role in shaping maintenance law in India. Here are some significant cases:

Kusum Sharma v. Mahinder Kumar Sharma (2015)

  1. The court emphasized that maintenance must ensure dignity and a decent standard of living, not mere survival.

  2. Parties were directed to file detailed affidavits of assets and liabilities to ensure fair determination of amount.

Shamima Farooqui v. Shahid Khan (2015)

  1. The Supreme Court observed that maintenance is a legal right, not charity.

  2. A wife is entitled to the same level of comfort as in her matrimonial home.

Dr. Avnish Pawar v. Dr. Sunita Pawar (2000)

  1. Maintenance should be proportionate to the payer’s actual income.

  2. The court emphasized a balanced approach, considering both the dependent’s needs and the payer’s capacity.

These judgments guide courts in applying Section 144 BNSS with fairness and humanity.

Comparison: Section 144 BNSS vs. Section 125 CrPC

 

Aspect Section 125 CrPC Section 144 BNSS
Legislation Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
Gender neutrality Primarily referred to “his wife” More inclusive and gender-neutral
Interim maintenance timeline No fixed timeline 60-day disposal period for interim maintenance
Definition of wife Included divorced woman Retained for better protection
Enforcement Imprisonment up to 1 month Same, with procedural clarity
Procedural efficiency Slower Faster, with defined timelines
Flexibility in commencement Date of order Order or application date, as per Magistrate
Objective Prevent destitution Prevent destitution with more clarity and enforcement

 

In short, Section 144 BNSS modernizes the existing law without diluting its welfare objective.

Practical Tips for Claiming or Defending Maintenance

  1. Collect evidence of income, expenses, and dependency early.

  2. File the application in the correct jurisdiction.

  3. If you’re a claimant, request interim maintenance to avoid financial hardship.

  4. If you’re a respondent, submit true financial disclosures to avoid exaggerated orders.

  5. Maintenance orders are modifiable — if your circumstances change, approach the court.

Social Importance of Maintenance Law

The maintenance law reflects India’s constitutional values of equality and social justice. It:

  1. Protects vulnerable dependents like women, children, and the elderly

  2. Prevents social problems like homelessness, destitution, and neglect

  3. Encourages family responsibility and accountability

  4. Supports women’s rights and child welfare

  5. Promotes dignity and human security

This makes Section 144 BNSS not just a legal provision but a pillar of social protection.

Common Misconceptions

 

Misconception Reality
Only wives can claim maintenance. Parents and children can also claim under Section 144 BNSS.
Maintenance is charity. It’s a legal right of dependents and a legal duty of those with means.
Orders cannot be changed. Orders can be modified or canceled based on changed circumstances.
Non-payment has no consequence. Non-payment can lead to recovery proceedings and imprisonment.
Interim maintenance takes years. Section 144 directs 60-day disposal of interim maintenance applications.

 

Conclusion

Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is a progressive step in strengthening maintenance law in India. While retaining the essence of Section 125 CrPC, it introduces more clarity, timelines, and enforcement measures.

This law ensures that:

  1. No dependent family member is left destitute

  2. Maintenance is treated as a right, not charity

  3. Legal remedies are faster and more efficient

  4. Social justice principles are upheld

For anyone neglected or financially abandoned, Section 144 BNSS offers a strong legal remedy to secure dignity and financial stability.
And for those responsible, it underscores a legal and moral duty to support their dependents.

Delhi Govt Notifies BNSS Rules: Electronic Summons and Warrants Now a Reality
Criminal

Delhi Govt Notifies BNSS Rules: Electronic Summons and Warrants Now a Reality

Introduction

The justice delivery system in India has long been criticized for delays, inefficiencies, and outdated processes. One such challenge was the service of summons and warrants—the formal notice sent by courts to individuals requiring their presence or compliance with judicial orders. Traditionally, these documents were delivered physically, often leading to weeks or even months of delay due to bureaucratic hurdles, incorrect addresses, and logistical inefficiencies.

In 2025, the Delhi Government took a bold step forward by notifying the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) Service of Summons and Warrants Rules, 2025. This move, approved earlier by Lieutenant Governor V. K. Saxena, allows courts in Delhi to send summons and warrants electronically via WhatsApp and email.

This reform is not just about technology—it represents a paradigm shift in criminal procedure law in India, aligning with the broader reforms under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which replaced the colonial-era Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973, from July 2024.

Also Read: Understanding BNS Section 238: A Comprehensive Guide

What Are Summons and Warrants?

Before diving into the reforms, it’s important to understand what summons and warrants mean in legal terms:

  1. Summons: A written order issued by a court directing a person to appear before it, either as an accused, witness, or in some other capacity. For example, if you are required to testify in a case, the court will send you a summons.

  2. Warrant: A court-issued authorization that empowers the police to carry out a specific action, such as arresting an accused, searching premises, or seizing property.

Traditionally, these documents were served physically by police officers or court officials, a process often plagued by delays, manipulation, or outright evasion by the accused.

Also Read: Section 110 BNS: A Comprehensive Guide to Attempt to Commit Culpable Homicide

Why the Change Was Needed

The old CrPC system had several shortcomings when it came to serving summons and warrants:

  1. Delays in Delivery
    A physical summons could take days or even weeks to reach the concerned person, especially if they had shifted addresses.

  2. Manipulation & Evasion
    Accused persons often dodged summons intentionally, creating unnecessary adjournments and delaying justice.

  3. Police Burden
    A large chunk of police manpower was spent on paperwork and clerical duties instead of law enforcement.

  4. No Transparency
    Once a summons was handed over, there was no clear digital trail of acknowledgment, leaving room for disputes.

By switching to electronic delivery, Delhi aims to tackle these bottlenecks and move towards a faster, transparent, and digital justice system.

Also Read: A Comprehensive Guide to Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023

Key Features of the BNSS Rules, 2025

The Delhi BNSS Rules for Service of Summons and Warrants, 2025, bring in several noteworthy provisions:

1. Electronic Delivery of Summons and Warrants

  1. Courts will now generate digitally signed summons and warrants.

  2. These will carry the judge’s digital seal and signature.

  3. They can be sent directly to the concerned person via WhatsApp and email.

  4. Digital acknowledgments will serve as proof of delivery.

2. Fallback to Physical Mode

  1. If electronic delivery fails (due to wrong number/email, network issues, or refusal to accept), courts can still order physical delivery.

  2. This ensures no accused can escape summons by simply ignoring electronic messages.

3. Victim Protection

  1. In sensitive cases—such as those under the POCSO Act, crimes involving women, children, or sexual offences—the identity of victims will be protected.

  2. Contact details like phone numbers and email IDs will remain confidential to prevent harassment.

4. Role of Police Stations

Every police station in Delhi will now:

  1. Maintain electronic and physical records of persons to be served.

  2. Upload verified details into the Crime and Criminal Tracking Network System (CCTNS).

  3. Report monthly to jurisdictional courts on the status of summons and warrants.

  4. Set up Electronic Summons Delivery Centres (ESDCs) for:

    1. Sending e-summons/warrants.

    2. Recording acknowledgments.

    3. Maintaining systematic logs for accountability.

5. Integration with National Crime Records

The data will feed into the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), ensuring nationwide tracking of summons/warrants.

Also Read: Facing a Death Threat? Here's What You Must Do Immediately

Why This Matters

The significance of this reform goes beyond convenience. Here’s why this is a game-changer:

1. Faster Justice

  1. Court summons that earlier took weeks can now be delivered instantly.

  2. This will help reduce unnecessary adjournments and speed up trials.

2. Reduced Police Burden

  1. Less paperwork and fewer physical visits to deliver notices.

  2. Police officers can now focus on investigation and law enforcement.

3. Transparency and Accountability

  1. Digital records provide clear evidence of delivery.

  2. Reduces chances of manipulation or disputes over whether a summons was received.

4. Victim Protection

  • Stronger safeguards in sensitive cases ensure that victims are not retraumatized during the legal process.

5. Paperless Courts

  • Supports India’s broader move toward Digital India and paperless governance.

BNSS and the Larger Criminal Law Reforms

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, is part of the trio of new criminal laws that replaced the IPC, CrPC, and Evidence Act:

  1. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 – Replaced IPC.

  2. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 – Replaced CrPC.

  3. Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023 – Replaced Evidence Act.

BNSS focuses on speedy, digital, and victim-centric justice. Other key reforms under BNSS include:

  1. Electronic recording of arrests and searches.

  2. Video conferencing for witness examination.

  3. Mandatory use of forensic evidence in serious crimes.

  4. Time-bound investigation and trials.

  5. Stricter bail provisions in certain offences.

Thus, the Delhi notification is a practical implementation of BNSS’s digital vision.

Implications of Electronic Summons and Warrants

Let’s break down the impact across different stakeholders:

1. For Citizens

  1. Citizens must regularly check registered WhatsApp and email accounts.

  2. Failure to respond to a court-issued e-summons will have legal consequences, just like ignoring physical summons.

2. For Victims

  1. Victims, especially in sensitive cases, get added privacy and dignity protections.

  2. Their contact details remain shielded, preventing secondary victimization.

3. For Police

  1. Administrative burden reduced.

  2. Increased accountability with digital records.

  3. Police can dedicate more resources to actual law enforcement.

4. For the Justice System

  1. Judicial processes become faster and more efficient.

  2. A step toward paperless courts, reducing environmental impact.

  3. Builds public confidence in a modern, transparent justice system.

Potential Challenges and Concerns

While the reform is revolutionary, challenges remain:

  1. Digital Divide
    Not every citizen has access to smartphones, internet, or email. For them, physical service remains crucial.

  2. Authenticity and Cybersecurity
    Concerns about fake summons via phishing emails or fraudulent WhatsApp messages may arise. Strong verification mechanisms are essential.

  3. Technical Glitches
    Delivery failures due to server issues, network problems, or outdated contact details may delay proceedings.

  4. Privacy Risks
    Storing large volumes of sensitive data in electronic form raises data protection and privacy issues.

  5. Awareness Gap
    Citizens must be educated and made aware that ignoring an e-summons is as serious as ignoring a physical one.

Safeguards and Solutions

To address these concerns, authorities must ensure:

  • Digital Verification: All e-summons should carry QR codes/digital signatures for authenticity.

  • Awareness Campaigns: Public campaigns to inform citizens about the new rules.

  • Fallback Options: Continued provision for physical delivery where digital fails.

  • Strong Cybersecurity: Protecting databases like CCTNS and NCRB from breaches.

  • Regular Updates: Citizens must be encouraged to keep phone/email details updated with government records.

Comparison with Global Practices

India is not the first country to move towards digital summons. Globally:

  • Singapore: Uses eLitigation systems for serving summons and notices electronically.

  • UK: Allows service of summons via email in civil cases.

  • US: Several states permit e-service of process through emails, especially in family law and civil disputes.

Delhi’s step under BNSS is thus in line with global best practices.

A Real-Life Example (Hypothetical)

Imagine a case where an accused living in another city is required to appear in a Delhi court. Earlier, the police would:

  1. Send a constable to deliver the summons.

  2. Spend weeks locating the accused.

  3. File repeated reports of “not found.”

Now, under the new rules:

  1. The court digitally signs the summons.

  2. It is sent instantly via WhatsApp and email.

  3. The accused gets an immediate notification.

  4. If acknowledged, it is logged digitally.

  5. If not, fallback physical delivery kicks in.

This saves time, cost, and resources for everyone involved.

Way Forward

Delhi is the first mover in operationalizing e-summons and e-warrants under BNSS. Other states are expected to follow soon. To ensure smooth rollout:

  1. Training for police and court staff in using digital systems.

  2. Public outreach to build trust in electronic delivery.

  3. Integration with Digital India initiatives, such as DigiLocker and Aadhaar-linked databases.

Ultimately, this reform is not just about technology—it’s about building a justice system that is faster, fairer, and more citizen-friendly.

Conclusion

The Delhi Government’s notification of BNSS Rules, 2025, enabling electronic delivery of summons and warrants, marks a historic leap in India’s criminal justice system. By embracing digital technology, the system is becoming faster, more transparent, and victim-centric.

While challenges like the digital divide and cybersecurity remain, the benefits far outweigh the risks. For citizens, this means faster justice and greater accountability. For police, it means less paperwork and more focus on real policing. For victims, it means stronger privacy protections. And for the justice system as a whole, it means moving toward a modern, digital era of justice delivery.

As other states follow Delhi’s lead, India will be closer to achieving the vision of a truly digital and efficient justice system, ensuring that justice is not delayed and not denied.