Stipend for Junior Lawyers in India: Bombay HC Slams Lack of Legal Backing

If you’re a fresh law graduate or a junior advocate trying to build your career in Indian courts, you already know how financially difficult the early years can be. Long hours, uncertain income, and high living costs often make it tough for young lawyers in India to survive in the profession.

In recent news, a petition filed in the Bombay High Court brought this issue into focus. The PIL sought a monthly stipend of ₹5,000 for junior lawyers in Maharashtra. The case has sparked a critical legal discussion: Can young lawyers legally demand a stipend from the Bar Council or the state government?

Also Read: Now get your Unpaid Salary

What Was the Case About?

The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Ajit Deshpande, a law student, and a group of young advocates. They demanded that the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa (BCMG) should pay a monthly stipend of ₹5,000 to lawyers who:

1. Have less than three years of practice

2. Earn less than ₹1 lakh annually

Why Did They File the Petition?

The petitioners argued:

1. Many fresh law graduates face severe financial hardship, particularly after COVID-19 disrupted court proceedings.

2. Junior lawyers often work unpaid or underpaid for senior advocates during their initial years.

3. Without financial support, talented young lawyers are forced to leave the profession for better-paying careers.

They also pointed out that other states like Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, and Jharkhand already have stipend schemes for junior lawyers.

Also Read: Supreme Court Mandates Three Years of Legal Practice for Judicial Service Eligibility: A Complete Guide

What Did the Bombay High Court Say?

The PIL was heard on June 25, 2025, by Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep Marne.

The judges agreed that:

1. The idea of providing a stipend to junior lawyers is morally right.

2. In a city like Mumbai, where living costs are high, a young advocate may even need ₹45,000/month to survive.

But they also asked critical questions:

“Is there a legal or statutory right that allows junior lawyers to demand a stipend?”

“Can the Court direct the Bar Council to pay stipends without proper legal backing?”

The Court’s Stand:

1. Good intentions aren’t enough. Courts can only issue orders if there is a clear statutory provision backing the demand.
2. Recommendations by the Bar Council of India (BCI) do not amount to binding law.

BCI Guidelines vs Legal Enforceability

The petitioners pointed to BCI guidelines recommending:

1. ₹20,000/month for junior lawyers in urban areas

2. ₹15,000/month for those in rural areas

These guidelines were issued after a Delhi High Court directive in July 2024.

However, the Bombay HC clarified:

1. BCI recommendations are advisory, not mandatory.

2. Unless there’s a law passed by Parliament or a state legislature, courts cannot enforce stipend payments.

Also Read: How to Become a Lawyer in India: A Comprehensive Guide

Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa: No Funds

The Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa (BCMG), represented by Advocate Uday Warunjikar, informed the Court:

1. The BCMG does not have sufficient funds to implement a stipend scheme.

2. The Maharashtra government has refused to provide financial support for the initiative.

3. A stipend scheme for all junior lawyers in Maharashtra would cost ₹155 crore per year.

4. Enrollment fees for new lawyers have been reduced from ₹15,000 to ₹600, resulting in significant revenue loss.

This highlighted the financial constraints faced by Bar Councils.

Also Read: The Rise of Online Lawyer Consultation: A Comprehensive Guide

Court’s Final Direction

The Bombay HC has adjourned the matter for two weeks, asking the petitioners to:
Present legal reasoning showing whether junior lawyers have a statutory right to demand stipends.
Demonstrate if the Bar Council is legally obliged to pay stipends.

Without clear legal backing, the Court cannot issue a mandamus (a directive forcing an authority to act).

Where Does the Law Stand on Junior Lawyer Stipends?

Under the Advocates Act, 1961:

So far, there is no legal provision compelling Bar Councils or governments to pay stipends to junior lawyers.

Lawyer’s Stipend: Comparison with Other States

Several Indian states already provide financial aid to junior advocates:

This shows that state government involvement is often crucial for running stipend schemes.

How Junior Lawyers Can Support Themselves Without Stipends

While the fight for stipends continues, here are practical tips for junior lawyers to sustain themselves:

1. Freelance Legal Work: Offer services like contract drafting, legal research, or opinion writing online.

2. Enroll on Legal Platforms: Websites like LegalKart and others connect clients with lawyers for consultations.

3. Legal Blogging & Content Writing: Share your knowledge and earn as a freelance legal writer.

4. Intern with NGOs or Legal Aid Clinics: Gain experience and modest stipends in some cases.

5. Teach Law Students: Offer tuitions for CLAT, judiciary exams, or law entrance coaching.

These strategies won’t replace a stipend but can provide some financial breathing room.

Why This Case Matters

This case raises critical questions for India’s legal ecosystem:

1. Should the legal profession support newcomers financially?

2. Can courts step in when there’s no clear law backing a demand?

3. How should Bar Councils and governments collaborate to ensure young lawyers aren’t priced out of the profession?

This isn’t just about ₹5,000 a month. It’s about making the legal profession inclusive and retaining talent.

The Way Forward

The Bombay HC has shown moral support for stipends but emphasized that laws, not emotions, govern decisions.

What Needs to Happen:

1. State governments should launch stipend schemes for junior advocates.

2. Parliament or state legislatures should pass laws mandating financial support for junior lawyers.

3. Bar Councils need increased funding through enrollment fees or government grants.

4. The legal fraternity must lobby for reforms to create a more inclusive profession.

Until then, the reality remains challenging for India’s junior lawyers.

Final Thoughts

The Bombay High Court’s observation is a wake-up call for the legal fraternity and policymakers. While stipends for junior lawyers are a noble idea, they need legal and financial backing to become a reality.

This issue is about more than money—it’s about ensuring that bright, hardworking young lawyers are not driven out of the profession due to financial stress.

The path ahead requires legislative will, government support, and collective action from the legal community.

Until then, young advocates will have to balance their passion for law with practical strategies for survival.