Blog

Introduction

India is known for having one of the highest numbers of road accidents in the world. Every year, thousands of people lose their lives on Indian roads due to reckless driving, speeding, and negligent behavior. One of the most alarming contributors to this crisis is hit-and-run cases — accidents where drivers flee the scene without helping the victim or informing authorities.

To curb this growing problem, the Indian government has introduced a new legal provision under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, replacing the older laws under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Motor Vehicles Act. The new law under Section 106 of BNS is designed to hold drivers more accountable and provide justice to victims. However, it has also sparked nationwide protests and debates, especially among transport workers and commercial drivers.

In this blog, we will explore everything you need to know about India’s hit-and-run law: its history, new provisions under BNS, the rationale behind the change, public response, and what this means for drivers and victims alike.

Understanding Hit and Run Cases

A hit-and-run case occurs when a vehicle is involved in an accident, and the driver does not stop to help the injured person or report the incident to the police. This is considered a serious offence because:

1. Victims are left without immediate help.

2. Delay in medical attention may lead to serious injuries or death.

3. It is morally and legally wrong to escape after causing harm.

Why do drivers flee?

1. Fear of being arrested.

2. Fear of mob violence.

3. Lack of awareness of legal procedures.

4. Attempt to avoid responsibility or consequences.

Hit-and-Run Law in India: What It Is

India’s hit-and-run law, especially after the implementation of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, has undergone major changes. The new law defines two levels of offences based on whether the driver reports the incident or flees.

Key Provisions:

• Section 106(1): If the driver reports the accident to the police or magistrate.

  • Punishment: Up to 5 years of imprisonment and fine.

• Section 106(2): If the driver flees the scene without reporting.

  • Punishment: Up to 10 years of imprisonment and fine.

This is a major step-up from the earlier laws where penalties were relatively mild and rarely enforced strictly.

The New Hit-and-Run Law Under BNS, 2023

What is the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, is a new criminal law that replaces the Indian Penal Code (IPC) of 1860. The aim of BNS is to modernize India's criminal justice system and make it more effective, just, and people-friendly.

How It Affects Hit-and-Run Cases

Under BNS, Section 106 categorically addresses the issue of hit-and-run accidents. The differentiation between drivers who report and those who don’t is meant to:

1. Encourage drivers to stay and assist.

2. Provide timely help to accident victims.

3. Ensure that drivers are held accountable.

Hit and Run Provisions Under the New Law

Let’s break down the two parts of Section 106:

Section 106(1): Reporting Drivers

1. Applies when a driver involved in an accident voluntarily reports the incident.

2. The report must be made to the nearest police station or magistrate.

3. Even though an offence has occurred, the law appreciates the driver’s accountability.

Punishment: Imprisonment of up to 5 years + fine.

Section 106(2): Fleeing the Scene

1. Applies when the driver does not report the accident and leaves the scene.

2. Considered a more serious offence.

3. Reflects an attempt to escape responsibility.

Punishment: Imprisonment of up to 10 years + fine.

These two sub-sections aim to create a clear legal distinction between negligent and irresponsible behavior.

Background of the Hit and Run Law in India

Before BNS, 2023

Earlier, hit-and-run cases were governed by:

• Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

  1. Required drivers to stop, help the injured, and report accidents.

  2. Enforcement was weak.

• Indian Penal Code, 1860

  1. Section 279: Rash and negligent driving – Punishment: up to 6 months or fine.

  2. Section 304A: Causing death by negligence – Punishment: up to 2 years or fine or both.

These laws were often criticized for being outdated and lenient, failing to act as strong deterrents against reckless driving.

Rising Road Accident Statistics

India’s roads have become increasingly dangerous:

1. 47,806 hit-and-run cases reported in 2022.

2. 50,815 deaths recorded from such cases.

3. 19 deaths per hour due to road accidents.

4. National and state highways account for over 50% of deaths though they make up only 5% of roads.

Rationale for the Hit and Run Law in India

Increasing Driver Accountability

The earlier laws did not instill fear or responsibility among drivers. By raising the punishment from 2 years to up to 10 years, the BNS aims to:

1. Deter reckless behavior.

2. Promote safe driving.

3. Ensure that drivers cannot easily escape the law.

Empowering Victims

Victims of hit-and-run accidents often struggled for:

1. Medical help.

2. Compensation.

3. Justice.

The new law provides a mechanism where reporting the incident becomes mandatory and non-compliance leads to jail, thus making it more likely for victims to get support on time.

Global Comparisons

India has:

1. 1% of the world’s vehicles.

2. 10% of global road accident deaths.

3. Loses 5-7% of GDP annually to road accidents.

Globally, countries like the USA, UK, and Australia have stringent laws for hit-and-run incidents. India’s new law seeks to align itself with these global standards.

Concerns and Protests Against the Law

Despite the positive intentions behind Section 106, there have been nationwide protests, particularly from commercial vehicle drivers.

Key Concerns:

1. Excessive Punishment

• 10 years of imprisonment for not reporting is seen as too harsh, especially when the death is unintentional.

2. Fear of Mob Violence

1. Drivers fear being lynched by angry crowds if they stop to help the victim.

2. Many prefer to escape rather than risk physical harm.

3. Unfair Blame

• Commercial drivers are more vulnerable to accusations due to the nature of their jobs.

4. Self-Incrimination

• Protesters argue it violates Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution, which protects individuals from self-incrimination.

5. Potential for Misuse

• Law enforcement or victims’ families may extort drivers or harass them.

6. Unequal Punishment

• For example, doctors involved in negligent accidents face only up to 2 years of imprisonment. Why are drivers penalized more harshly?

7. Real-World Challenges Ignored

1. Poor road conditions.

2. Bad weather and low visibility.

3. Long working hours for truck drivers.

These factors are often beyond the control of the driver.

Government’s Response and the Way Forward

Given the intense backlash, the Government of India decided to delay the implementation of the law and initiate consultations with stakeholders.

Proposed Solutions:

• Protection from mob violence: Emergency helplines and quick police response mechanisms.

• Driver insurance and legal aid: Especially for commercial drivers.

• Awareness campaigns: To educate drivers about their rights and responsibilities.

• Differentiated penalties: Based on the severity of negligence and intention.

• Emergency reporting systems: Easy mobile-based options to report accidents.

The government must work towards creating a balance — holding people accountable while protecting those who act in good faith.

Impact of the Law on Road Safety

While the law’s impact is yet to be fully assessed, if implemented fairly, it could lead to:

• Reduction in fatalities due to timely medical attention.

• Improved reporting and data on accidents.

• Greater trust in the legal system.

• A deterrent for irresponsible and reckless driving.

Conclusion

The new hit-and-run law under Section 106 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, marks a significant shift in India’s approach to road safety. It emphasizes accountability, justice for victims, and deterrence of irresponsible driving.

However, for the law to be successful, it must be enforced with fairness, clarity, and supportive infrastructure. Concerns raised by drivers must be addressed through policy tweaks, awareness programs, and better legal safeguards.

With the right intent and inclusive policymaking, India can move towards safer roads and a more responsible driving culture.

Introduction

With the introduction of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) in 2023, India took a bold step towards modernizing its criminal justice framework. The BNS replaces the colonial-era Indian Penal Code (IPC), bringing with it new sections and revised interpretations of criminal conduct. One such important provision is Section 106, which addresses “death by negligence.”

Section 106 plays a crucial role in balancing justice between unfortunate accidents and criminal liability. This article offers a comprehensive and easy-to-understand guide to Section 106 of BNS, exploring its text, interpretation, punishment, key legal concepts, comparisons with IPC, case laws, and real-world implications.

What is Section 106 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)?

Section 106 BNS (Verbatim Text):

“Whoever causes the death of any person by doing any rash or negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.”

Key Points:

1. Focuses on rash or negligent acts leading to death.

2. Applies only when the act does not amount to culpable homicide.

3. Punishment: Imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both.

Understanding the Key Terms

1. Negligence

Negligence is the failure to exercise the care that a reasonable and prudent person would exercise in similar circumstances. It implies a lack of intention but demonstrates carelessness.

Example: A driver texting while driving and hitting a pedestrian.

2. Rash Act

A rash act is one done without due consideration or care, often in haste, but with knowledge that the act may cause harm.

Example: Over-speeding a vehicle on a crowded road.

3. Not Amounting to Culpable Homicide

Culpable homicide involves intention or knowledge that the act could likely cause death. Section 106 excludes such cases. It is applicable only when there’s no intention or knowledge of causing death.

Punishment Under Section 106

• Imprisonment: Up to 2 years.

• Fine: Amount is not specified, allowing judicial discretion.

• Both: In certain cases, the court may impose both imprisonment and fine.

The punishment reflects a lesser degree of criminality, acknowledging that the death was unintentional yet caused by irresponsible conduct.

Examples of Offences Under Section 106

1. Medical Negligence: A surgeon operates without proper sterilization, causing fatal infection.

2. Construction Mishaps: A contractor ignores safety norms leading to a laborer's death.

3. Traffic Accidents: A person driving under the influence causing a fatal crash.

4. Fire Hazards: A shopkeeper stores flammable goods carelessly and a fire breaks out, killing someone.

In each case, there's no intention to kill, but carelessness leads to death, making Section 106 applicable.

Difference Between Section 106 BNS and IPC Section 304A

Section 106 of BNS replaces Section 304A of the IPC, which had similar wording:

“Whoever causes the death of any person by doing any rash or negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide…”

Comparison Table:

While there is little structural change, BNS brings better contextual clarity, improved definitions in the preamble, and consolidation of legal terms used across criminal laws.

Legal Elements to Prove Under Section 106

To secure a conviction under Section 106, the following elements must be proven in court:

1. The accused performed a negligent or rash act.

2. The act resulted in the death of another person.

3. The act did not amount to culpable homicide.

4. There was no intent or knowledge of causing death.

The burden of proof lies on the prosecution to establish these elements beyond reasonable doubt.

Judicial Interpretation and Key Case Laws

While the BNS is new, judicial interpretations from IPC’s Section 304A remain relevant. Here are key Supreme Court and High Court cases:

1. Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab (2005)

Issue: Medical negligence resulting in death.

Ruling: Doctors cannot be held criminally liable unless it is proved that they were grossly negligent. Mere error of judgment is not enough.

Significance: Set the precedent for "gross negligence" as a criterion under 304A (and now Section 106 BNS).

2. Kurban Hussein v. State of Maharashtra (1965)

Issue: A worker died due to an industrial accident caused by negligence.

Ruling: The act must be the direct and proximate cause of death.

Significance: Reinforced the need for a clear causal link between the negligent act and the death.

3. Sushil Ansal v. State (Uphaar Cinema Fire Case)

Issue: Death of 59 persons due to fire safety negligence in a cinema hall.

Ruling: Builders and owners found guilty under Section 304A IPC.

Significance: Corporate liability and accountability for public safety lapses.

Real-Life Application of Section 106 BNS

Let’s understand how Section 106 works in practice through simplified examples:

Case 1: Road Accident by a Bus Driver

A bus driver overspeeds and hits a pedestrian crossing the road, resulting in death. He had no intent to kill, but his rash driving makes him liable under Section 106.

Case 2: Construction Site Fatality

An engineer ignores faulty scaffolding despite warnings. It collapses and kills a worker. The engineer didn’t intend harm, but the gross negligence invites liability under Section 106.

Case 3: Chemical Factory Leak

A chemical factory stores hazardous chemicals improperly. A leak occurs and a worker dies. The negligence is not intentional but still punishable under this provision.

Defenses Against Section 106 Charges

An accused under Section 106 may use the following legal defenses:

1. Absence of Negligence: Prove that the act was performed with reasonable care.

2. No Causation: Show that the act did not directly cause death.

3. Act of God: An unforeseeable event like an earthquake caused the incident.

4. Sudden Medical Condition: In road accident cases, a sudden seizure or blackout may serve as a defense.

The courts critically assess these defenses, and burden of proof may shift once initial evidence is shown.

Impact on Victims and Families

For the Victim’s Family:

1. Section 106 is not compensatory in nature.

2. Victims must file a civil suit or claim under the Motor Vehicles Act, Consumer Protection Act, or public liability laws for compensation.

3. The criminal case is for punishment, not monetary redressal.

For the Accused:

1. Punishment may be lenient, but conviction still leads to criminal record.

2. Professional licenses (e.g., doctors, engineers) may be revoked upon conviction.

3. It may also affect government jobs or foreign travel.

Why Section 106 Matters in Today’s India

As India urbanizes rapidly, accidental deaths due to negligence are on the rise — in hospitals, roads, construction sites, and public spaces.

• Over 1.5 lakh people die every year in road accidents alone.

• Workplace safety remains poor in unorganized sectors.

• Medical negligence cases are increasingly being reported.

Section 106 ensures that the law responds to these tragedies firmly yet fairly, recognizing the human error but also ensuring accountability.

Need for a Criminal Lawyer Under Section 106 BNS

Whether you're accused or a victim’s family member, consulting a criminal lawyer is crucial:

For the Accused:

1. A lawyer can help prove absence of negligence or lack of causation.

2. Ensures rights are protected during arrest and investigation.

3. Can negotiate for bail or plea bargaining.

For the Victim’s Family:

1. Helps initiate criminal complaint and FIR.

2. Can guide on compensation claims through civil or consumer forums.

3. Ensures court monitoring of the case.

A skilled lawyer can make the difference between justice served and justice denied.

Policy Suggestions to Strengthen Section 106 Implementation

1. Mandatory Safety Audits: Especially in high-risk sectors like construction and manufacturing.

2. Awareness Drives: To educate professionals about their legal responsibilities.

3. Digital Evidence Collection: From CCTVs, wearable devices, or vehicles for stronger proof.

4. Special Courts: For accident and negligence cases to speed up justice delivery.

5. Better Compensation Mechanisms: Linked to criminal conviction under Section 106.

Conclusion

Section 106 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita is a critical legal provision that deals with the delicate intersection of accident and accountability. It does not treat accidents as mere misfortunes if they arise out of rash or negligent behavior. Instead, it assigns criminal responsibility, albeit without equating it to murder or culpable homicide.

As India strives toward better rule of law and safety norms, Section 106 ensures that negligence is not brushed aside, and those affected by such acts are not left without justice.